More About Reversing B Radioactivity

Did you know? Recent research seems to show that the solar radiation is linked to neutrino flux? Yes! About 3% more neutrinos reach the Earth before a CME. This has been unknown in cause. They reach at night so this is how they were known to be neutrinos since they hit the sensors by going through the Earth, all the other radiation is stopped by the Earth, since neutrinos are so radiant, if you look at the sun at night, almost the same trillion neutrinos go through you eye as when you look up in the light hours.

This about change in neutrinos has been believed a good advance warning defence for CME events that can cause serious problems and the warning if achieved could save much, click here  for my site about CME defence.

As in the method of reducing radioactivity on this site I envision, the change seen in the machines may fit in the same frame of what is known. here's my possible way to fit this in well with the method of reversing B radioactivity;

The neutrino is released and moves our way.

The sensors have the elements that are somewhat radioactive, most of the neutrinos move past it.  This is because time reversed beta radioactivity needs both electrons and the neutron and the heavy radioactive elements to occur. The electrons are zooming around the metal. Remember a wire with most of the electricity in light? A considerable fraction is also loose electrons. Sometimes some of the electrons will hit just right, and the neutrino is nearby. The reaction converts the proton to a neutron of the heavy atom, and neutrons don't attract neutrons, out they go and the machines senses the change.

This may be made quantitative, by consideration of the number of electrons in the metal, the cross section of the neutrinos with time, and the angle of the NS of the atoms since if SN the electron will be more like a positron and the reaction is changed due to the quantum numbers.

  If this is confirmed quantitatively, it would perhaps also fit and improve the method of reducing the radioactivity.



REDUCING RADIOACTIVITY BY BINDING AND USING A RADIANT BEAM?

One method of reducing radioactivity that has recently been devised in Germany is to bind radioactive atoms in a cooling  shell of other atoms; the high energy particles hit the target and this makes them radiate by implosion, so the radioactivity is 100 times faster.

I would think the problem here is about the radiance of the particles, essentially the reaction seems like short range reversed fusion, like with laser fusion. This is how the process with the machine was discovered. Click here.

Laser fusion is unstable, but the method of my site would not have the unstable reaction like fusion, the targets are stationary, and there is no high energy beam used. The radioactive atoms would be cooled and the electrons own field would implode mostly cancelling the unstable entropy of the radiation of the binding method.

So as far I can see, my method seems better than the German method where efficiency is concerned. Even so I envision using the methods in combination, to speed up both or e.g. to clean more stubborn types of radioactivity, after all we call a radioactive spill a value to clean.