Radioactivity is a big problem for the world. A good method of reducing the radioactivity may help us survive war and accidents. A possible solution I saw on The Ezine Articles site by Lance Winslow (Future Concepts) is how radioactivity would be reduced in a radioactive piece of mass by an external hot radiant beam into a radioactive mass and make it radiate out more by energising the hot mass. This radiant energy would then be used as a power source such as for heating and cooling. Burning the U237 would convert it embers, with no more radioactive heat. The power would be collected fast and since it's easier to use and collect this power this would save us from having to wait millions of years. I wouldn't have to set my watch in other months!

.

The Weak force is the force that powers radioactivity. It was unified with the general theory of electricity in the ElectroWeak theory in the 60's. The Electroweak theory says the force of Electricity and the Weak Force are unified with two charges, plus and minus. A flow of charge between them like light for electricity controls all of the force. The above about using a radiating beam is a method of making a more rapid radioactivity and collecting the radiation fast. After all, a woman seen on TV in the AM says she has a radiant CBS personality! If the Weak Force has two opposite charges that can cancel like the + and - electric charges when one charge is unbound and causing the radioactivity, perhaps a method of binding the Weak Force so the radioactivity is stopped by a Weak Force Beam of the opposite charge may be of value. An "active cancelling" shield via a radioactive beam like this may make the atomic planes or other such inventions more possible by reducing the amount of lead shielding necessary. They've already found a way to reduce the half life of the radiation by using "Cascading" radioactivity of a lighter sort than Uranium, however there would still be radioactivity for quite a while if this type of atomic plane crashed, and this type of cancelling would make it safer yet. So science of this sort may be of value to us.
.Lerner's focus fusion machine, or my atomic motor may be of worth to make the radiant beam to cancel the charge. Focus fusion uses the electric field to make hadrons like protons and neutrons implode, causing fusion by exact implosion. So actually fusion science in perhaps 20 years may be used to stop the radioactivity caused by fission.

..

.

Active Cancellation And B Radioactivity

Beta decay is a common motif of subatomic physics. When a proton is converted to a neutron when the proton emits a positron and a neutrino. The overall electric charge remains the same. (In atomic physics it's known there's an adjustment of the electric field of the atom. The neutron tries to reconvert to a proton by electrical adjustment but this can take anywhere from a fraction of a second to days, so this might be achieved by changing the wavelength of the input field and so on faster than the time it would take for the adjustment to take place.) If you have a proton and neutron which attract due to opposite isospin charges and you reverse this process for the proton, it's possible protons could be converted to neutrons in radioactive nuclei. By injecting one electron and a neutrino, this would make what was a proton and a neutron into two neutrons, so they would be much easier to remove from the ersatz radiant nucleus, and would then move away from the nucleus by way of (linear) centrifugal force since the like charge of both neutrons (strong) charge would not be a binding force. To combine the outside electron with the nuclear proton, the opposite N S and N S poles of the electron and the atomic and nuclear fields would implode when aligned with the atomic protons, converting them to neutrons, this entire process is the time reversed process of beta decay. Beta or not Beta, time rewind, some say, is the solution in much of physics! (The electrons with more wavelength than the proton would be focused to fit with a lense into the funnel of the magnetic field of the proton, under the influence of an external field like that used in MRI.) The same is possible but mostly unviable with positrons to make more protons out of neutrons.

.

The strong force lines would be cut just by the of addition of electrons, and this would be of worth, reducing radioactivity because nuclei with fewer protons or neutrons are more stable. We would just have to wait a few hours for the uranium to convert to hydrogen, not millions of years and we would have hydrogen and and electric power left over. Using the electrons to cut the lines of the strong force could be useful to reduce the proliferation of other types of hazardous materials. They may be blessed out west via no waste in their water otherwise till a safer method is found to solve this, and waste from reactors and other radioactivity will continue to pile up. And by reducing the protons to the right number from the uranium it could even realize the alchemists age old dream of changing base metals to gold economically, or this motif might be used to convert chemical waste to better compounds. And by reducing radioactivity it would make atomic mining feasable.

.

Merely cutting the lines of force instead of compression and or pulling it till it snaps with resilience (till it gives way with too much expansion to be so stable) would mean the outward neutrons would be safer and lower energy. While fusion has this snapback of the field plus inertia, the motif of cutting the line of force would have just inertia mostly, with lower energy so this would cause lower chance of fission than more conventional motifs, and fusion takes more energy of the neutrons so this would be of lower probability than the already low probability of fission by this type of science. We already have lower energy neutrons and they're considered safe.
.

This couldn't be used for other purposes like a radiation shield over a city because it would only be for short range worth; without a field to align the incoming electron with the N or S of the radiant atom it wouldn't be able to combine in to cancel out the proton because of the outer electric field almost all atoms (the main type of matter) has. (In the country, a field would make them a brew if cultivation was a lot of booze!) Like magnetism, with the air having more heat, the random motion of the magnetic fields by Curie's law moderates magnetism at higher temperatures. Even if the atoms could be aligned with a super strong magnetic field above an area of land like a city (which would not much better than the problem) the electrons would be scattered by the intervening atoms, so even when a splurge to Honalulu saves on the heating, the probability they would hit just so would be not worth the effort on building the machine just for an urban shield of this type. When you have an atom in the air, the only way the incoming electron could combine with a proton would be via its small wavelength (high energy) with the magnetic field of opposite polarity of the atom so it would hit just right to implode well, and a combination of both of these events would be uncommon. Air also has not much charge to align with the field.

.

..It may seem that the only way protons and electrons can be combined like this is by super pressure like in massive stars where the pressure is high, but it may be relatively easy to achieve in some limited situations. Many combinations are tried by the dense massive star so it finally hits the one that combines well, somewhat like a computer that solves a code by using a large number of combinations. This idea of using electrons of reversed magnetic attraction N S to the N S of the atomic field to reach the proton of the nucleus would be like knowing the combination ahead of time without all the number crunching.

.

After the electrons convert the protons to neutrons and then filtered out the neutrons from the uranium, you have all the neutrons.. These isolated neutrons will also then decay, Isn't this just more radioactivity?" you may ask . A simple way is to put the neutrons in a reflective box or a box with sides made of standing wave of laser light that would let the neutrons be supported at the base between the stasis of their weight and the atoms of the box. While the radioactivity would indeed be present (I like to listen to a radio in a silver and gold wave at christmas, hint, hint if you're rich!) it would be the same B radioactive decay of the neutrons from the atoms to a electron and with the protons, these would combine if held in a container to make hydrogen. The binding of the protons with the electrons may be achieved just by shaking it up a bit.

..

It might seem using B radioactivity wouldn’t be of worth if the electrons would have trouble finding the right spot where the magnetic pole of the nucleus was.. Since a machine like strong MRI would align the atoms well, if MRI aligns the nuclei even if the outside electrons of each would shield, this means there are reliable ways to interact with the nuclear polarity from outside even if the shielding electrons of each atom would seem to stop the electron of the B radioactivity (Mazola rounds me out) so even with the shield of the electrons, the electron of the beam could either find it’s own way and a tunneling beam might be used, or since it’s well known that at high energy a particle with no charge like light behaves like a heavy particle, we might be able to find the right energy of the beam to not interact much with the outer electrons while gaining power enough inside the heavy atoms to find the right compression to convert to an electron there under the higher density of the field, and thus reverse the radioactivity because we know where the inner field of life is, FM as seen on fitness jog zooms when she zips by! We would know where the poles of the inner realms of the atoms because they align by tunneling right after the MRI, and a low energy beam at the speed of light at the right wavelength would sense where the outermost atoms and the S or N pole that would yield the neutrons would be and would remove the outer neutrons layer by layer even if at high speed, saving more energy of the beams. Since half of the neutrons would be flung outward and half inward by the spin of the nuclei, this would reduce short term efficiency by 50% but when the layers were removed ever deeper, the entire mass of atoms in a while might eventually be converted to much more energy in than out a bit later. The ingoing protons from this process would be lower energy than like in fusion so they would bind without causing much upset to then be removed (may help mothers burp with bromo seltzer the Band That Rocks With Mamma, Fizzes The World..) We may not see much of this process of reversed B radioactivity in usual atoms like the air because the electron would have to line up with the atoms just so without the machine and this is not probable. Even so there may be a certain low probability of this happening, and research with the radioactivity of the air may be a good way to test see if this is of more worth. Of course we can't always predict subatomic physics just by thinking about math, so this line of research with a huge payoff may be worth more research even if the predicted rate around us is not seen for some reason, this might be much cheaper than a 10 billion dollar machine. Even if this process may be a bit complex, it may be far simpler and cheaper than other machines other than the problem of lepton number, which is conserved. The best option may be to merely aim the machine toward the sun, it radiates out about 1/5th of its energy in the form of neutrinos, about a billion per second through your lenses even when you wear your shades, talk about power for geometerologists! Here are some other possible ways we might solve this..

...

.

One way to create shielding e.g. for computer monitors may be using a laser or maser to slow down the incoming radiant heavy particles from the monitor and waiting awhile with the particles in a holding zone and then just combining the end products of the decay, protons and electrons, to make hydrogen. Using a way like this to reduce computer radiation from lead shielding in monitors may solve this problem for the environment which will otherwise build up over time and contaminate our food and water. If heavier nucleii are in the radiation these could be filtered out by making the holding zone a centrifuge or by using their electric field and these would then be dissolved by reversing the B radioactivity in a second step and reducing the heavier nucleii to hydrogen.

.

The machine would be simple to operate, and would take just a few minutes to make a lot of hydrogen (protons and electrons from just a wire and the muons) out of a pound of e.g. U 238, and in the hydrogen economy this could be a source of extra energy from uranium. Waiting a few minutes for rich, clean hydrogen from radioactivity would be a lot easier than waiting millions of years, and hot dish while you save.

.

.

PASSIVE SHIELDING

...

Protons may make a good passive lightweight shield if held in a sheet by the opposite magnetic poles of each proton in a wire that has an outer tubular field of electrons, a sort of continuous atom with the protons in a strong link at the center, so the proton wire is super strong for many uses. It would be a thin plate that would be a more efficient shield. If you have a shield of just lead the high energy particles go through, all the particles have to line up by luck to stop all of them. If you have a robo mower and it mows at random, it takes a lot mower time to mow the lawn, because it's inefficient, so this type of shield may be reduced in weight and size because the proton wires would shield more of the room continuously with the same amount of proton mass. Atoms take up a lot of room, but proton or neutron wires may be much more dense, so they could be more efficient. A neucleus in conventional lead shielding is a sphere but a shield just of proton and neutron wires would be a plane one proton and one neutron in depth so it would be much thinner with the same amount of shield reducing weight by 75% or more. Because the neutron has an internal electric field (plus and minus make 0) wires of this material also might be bound by the somewhat longer range electric and nearer strong force inside the protons or neutrons. Something makes particles like protons and neutrons not have absolute implosion so at some level as the longer strong force charges of protons and like neutrons in e,g. atomic physics implode they would seem to balance between the attractive and the short range contact force like the Weak Force charge. If the implosive force is strong like the strong force in usual atomic reactions it's more probable to create instability by the reaction causing expansion out under pressure, like the sun's gravity causes radiation outward by the implosion of the mass, but like protons and like neutrons of these types of solids would have not much strong attraction because the like strong charges in like protons and like neutrons don't attract as much. (Or the strong poles might be reversed relative to the magnetic poles so the magnetic poles would attract in general until they reach the strong somewhat expansive force at reduced distance, the balance between them may be stable, making a solid of both strong cohesion and compression.) Because the magnetic field lines of the strong force would compress and strengthen the magnetic field lines this may make it stronger in tension than any other electromagnetically bound solid, and like nanotubes because the field lines lining up might conduct electricity except with more power and reduced power loss because the lines are strong. Strong force particles neither attract or repel, compression further inward would reach a more solid footing as it must to not implode infinitely. If the shielding were cheap (see hadron solid for more about super dense solids) lead shielding could be replaced with shields made of proton and neutron wires in many machines.

..

For More Physics Click Here for My Physics Links Pg.

MAIN SITE And MORE...

..

This Site Is IP Protected

& By The Author...

..